{"id":645,"date":"2008-06-25T12:12:12","date_gmt":"2008-06-25T12:12:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danielprimed.com\/?p=645"},"modified":"2012-03-03T04:57:57","modified_gmt":"2012-03-03T04:57:57","slug":"few-tweaks-and-a-re-focused-outlook","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danielprimed.com\/2008\/06\/few-tweaks-and-a-re-focused-outlook\/","title":{"rendered":"Few Tweaks and a Re-Focused Outlook"},"content":{"rendered":"
Another brief status report coming your way. You may have noticed a few changes that I have made to the site, here is a punchy, dotpoint outline:<\/p>\n
New Slew of Content Spotlight articles
\nRemoved Sexiest People in Games
\nRemoved Retro Review
\nRemoved Images that Defined Video Games
\nAdded Visual Connection
\nAdded Journals
\nRemoved BlogRush Widget
\nAdded Twitter Feed<\/p>\n
Basically I felt that the removed features didn’t match where I want to go with the site. The Retro Review was originally intended to be an overview of older titles but I think that this ultimately fails when A) I’d rather critique then write a technical account B) There are already sites like Wikipedia, MobyGames<\/a> and HardcoreGaming101<\/a> which do this already and do it better.<\/p>\n Despite Googles favouritism towards it, I don’t wish to continue the Sexiest People in Games<\/a> feature. Once again it is a bit like me pretending to be biopic\/Wikipedia role doesn’t really fit me. I do like the idea of Visual Connection though as it is a way for me to congregate those largely image dominated articles together. Journals as stated last time<\/a> is a platform for me to attempt (read: struggle) to write something of an academic nature.<\/p>\n