{"id":620,"date":"2008-04-27T00:33:20","date_gmt":"2008-04-27T00:33:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danielprimed.com\/?p=620"},"modified":"2012-03-03T09:59:30","modified_gmt":"2012-03-03T09:59:30","slug":"when-game-review-criteria-hits-the-floor-hard","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danielprimed.com\/2008\/04\/when-game-review-criteria-hits-the-floor-hard\/","title":{"rendered":"When Game Review Criteria Hits the Floor Hard"},"content":{"rendered":"
It wasn’t too long ago that I posted up my opinions about game reviews and my great frustrations with them. I want to talk more about this issue at a later date but for now though I would like to further substantiate the previous article with a final conclusion, courtesy of IGN.<\/p>\n
Before I start I want to share a little bit of context. When it comes to standardize, routine video game news and reviews I am subscribed to two sites to provide me with such content. They are IGN<\/a> and for a wider, more down to earth scope Video Games Blogger<\/a>. I am aware of such issues with IGN and fortunately I can filter out there content worthy of my time from another paid DS review or hyped up preview. Despite this there is a certain authority about IGN that I am bound to which I ought to ditch sometime. So if any of you readers have any suggestions then fire away.<\/p>\n In anycase, since I have an Australian IP address, IGN sees fit to send me all of their Australian (brought to you by Cam Shea!) and UK based content which is fair enough. The following is a review of Wii Fit which I would like to briefly analyze.<\/p>\n I genuinely have no beef with IGN, they are fine and this is by no means an attack at the site or their reviews. What is presented here, is as I see it a good example of a common problem within the industry. With that in mind, lets dance:<\/p>\nMy Previous Article<\/a><\/p>\n