{"id":4471,"date":"2013-03-01T08:39:30","date_gmt":"2013-03-01T08:39:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/danielprimed.com\/?p=4471"},"modified":"2013-03-01T08:44:31","modified_gmt":"2013-03-01T08:44:31","slug":"deep-reading-a-reason-to-go-offline","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/danielprimed.com\/2013\/03\/deep-reading-a-reason-to-go-offline\/","title":{"rendered":"Deep Reading \u2013 A Reason to go Offline?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

The internet is no place for sustained reading and deep thought.<\/strong><\/p>\n

That’s a strong statement, but it’s one that I feel increasingly adamant about. The form of a media determines the nature of its content, and there are aspects of the internet which dissuade the user from critical thinking. Of course, the internet is an umbrella for many different types of media. For the purpose of this post, I want to discuss the medium you are consuming right now: the article.<\/p>\n

From early last year, I started doing most of my reading on my Kindle, a device which, I guess many Kindle enthusiasts would also attest to, has totally changed my reading habits. Almost straight away, I noticed that it was easier to read through my Kindle than through a web browser, as I’d been doing in the past. I’ve become a better reader ever since. After a bit of investigating, I discovered why. Online, long-form text is usually surrounded by:<\/p>\n