<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duke Nukem Teaser Trash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielprimed.com/gaming/critique-gaming/duke-nukem-teaser-trash/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielprimed.com/gaming/critique-gaming/duke-nukem-teaser-trash</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://danielprimed.com/gaming/critique-gaming/duke-nukem-teaser-trash#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielprimed.com/gaming/news/duke-nukem-teaser-trash#comment-2236</guid>
		<description>You're right, they should have more to show for it. Although its hard to figure out where they are actually up to with DNF's development cycle. The game has been moved to multiple game engines since 2001. 

Judging from previous footage, they seemingly had a great selection of ideas for the game. But since we've been told to forget about everything prior to the teaser, I'm guesing that they basically scrapped everything a few years ago. Which is quite disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, they should have more to show for it. Although its hard to figure out where they are actually up to with DNF&#8217;s development cycle. The game has been moved to multiple game engines since 2001. </p>
<p>Judging from previous footage, they seemingly had a great selection of ideas for the game. But since we&#8217;ve been told to forget about everything prior to the teaser, I&#8217;m guesing that they basically scrapped everything a few years ago. Which is quite disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Ella</title>
		<link>http://danielprimed.com/gaming/critique-gaming/duke-nukem-teaser-trash#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 07:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielprimed.com/gaming/news/duke-nukem-teaser-trash#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>I don't know; I never saw the 2001 trailer you're talking about, but I just know that this one didn't really get me excited. The quick cuts were simply too quick for me to really see anything, the trailer was too short overall, didn't provide me with a whole lot, and honestly, the one line of dialogue was just really cheesy.

Who knows? It could go either way. You'd just think after all these years, they'd have more to show for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know; I never saw the 2001 trailer you&#8217;re talking about, but I just know that this one didn&#8217;t really get me excited. The quick cuts were simply too quick for me to really see anything, the trailer was too short overall, didn&#8217;t provide me with a whole lot, and honestly, the one line of dialogue was just really cheesy.</p>
<p>Who knows? It could go either way. You&#8217;d just think after all these years, they&#8217;d have more to show for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
