<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duke Nukem Teaser Trash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danielprimed.com/2007/12/duke-nukem-teaser-trash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danielprimed.com/2007/12/duke-nukem-teaser-trash/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 10:10:25 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://danielprimed.com/2007/12/duke-nukem-teaser-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-2236</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 13:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielprimed.com/gaming/news/duke-nukem-teaser-trash#comment-2236</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, they should have more to show for it. Although its hard to figure out where they are actually up to with DNF&#039;s development cycle. The game has been moved to multiple game engines since 2001. 

Judging from previous footage, they seemingly had a great selection of ideas for the game. But since we&#039;ve been told to forget about everything prior to the teaser, I&#039;m guesing that they basically scrapped everything a few years ago. Which is quite disappointing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, they should have more to show for it. Although its hard to figure out where they are actually up to with DNF&#8217;s development cycle. The game has been moved to multiple game engines since 2001. </p>
<p>Judging from previous footage, they seemingly had a great selection of ideas for the game. But since we&#8217;ve been told to forget about everything prior to the teaser, I&#8217;m guesing that they basically scrapped everything a few years ago. Which is quite disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Ella</title>
		<link>http://danielprimed.com/2007/12/duke-nukem-teaser-trash/comment-page-1/#comment-2235</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Ella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 07:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danielprimed.com/gaming/news/duke-nukem-teaser-trash#comment-2235</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know; I never saw the 2001 trailer you&#039;re talking about, but I just know that this one didn&#039;t really get me excited. The quick cuts were simply too quick for me to really see anything, the trailer was too short overall, didn&#039;t provide me with a whole lot, and honestly, the one line of dialogue was just really cheesy.

Who knows? It could go either way. You&#039;d just think after all these years, they&#039;d have more to show for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know; I never saw the 2001 trailer you&#8217;re talking about, but I just know that this one didn&#8217;t really get me excited. The quick cuts were simply too quick for me to really see anything, the trailer was too short overall, didn&#8217;t provide me with a whole lot, and honestly, the one line of dialogue was just really cheesy.</p>
<p>Who knows? It could go either way. You&#8217;d just think after all these years, they&#8217;d have more to show for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
